Moscow Automobile and Highway State Technical University (MADI). Arkhangelsky's television experience

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Faculty of Communications, Media and Design, National Research University Higher School of Economics. In the past, he was the author and presenter of the television programs “Against the Current” and “Chronograph”. Since 2002 - author and presenter of the “Meanwhile” program. Co-founder of the Academy of Russian Contemporary Literature. Author of scientific and popular science books “The Poetic Tale of A. S. Pushkin” Bronze Horseman“” (1990), “Conversations about Russian literature. The end of the 18th - first half of the 19th century" (1998), "Heroes of Pushkin. Essays on Literary Characterology" (1999), collections of literary criticism ("At the Main Entrance", 1991), journalistic articles. Author of prose books “1962. Epistle to Timothy" (latest edition - 2008), "The Price of Cutting Off" (2008), "Museum of the Revolution" (2012), etc. The book "Alexander I" went through several editions in Russia and was translated into French and Chinese. Author of school textbooks, methodological manuals, reading books on literature. Author of the films “Memory Factory: Libraries of the World”, “Department”, “Heat”, “Intellectual. Vissarion Belinsky", "Exile. Alexander Herzen" and others.

The wrong hero of our time

How Lermontov, having written a novel in two parts, deceived Nicholas I and other readers

The Return of Philosophy

Who, how and why began to study philosophy in Stalin's time - a quarter of a century after its traditions were destroyed

Palace under the hood

How graduates of the Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow State University created a territory of freedom in the magazine - the mouthpiece of the communist parties in the early 1960s

Incredible Institute

How in a Soviet academic institute they read leading bourgeois newspapers, studied theater, the hippie movement and modern Western philosophy

The noose tightens

How Soviet tanks rolled into Prague in 1968 ended previously existing opportunities for humanities research

In front of the barrier

What philosophers have done for schoolchildren, deaf-blind people, for literature, cinema and to change the world

Victory and disappointment

What did Soviet philosophers give the world: awareness of the impossibility of changing reality or a revived language of philosophizing?

Zabolotsky. "Passerby"

How the poet stretched out the moment, overcame death and wrote a mysterious poem in the simplest words

Trifonov. "House on the Embankment"

How Trifonov stepped over his conscience, then mercilessly condemned himself, and at the same time comprehended the mechanisms of political terror

Department of Heat Engineering and Automotive Engines | Arkhangelsky Vladimir Mitrofanovich

V.M. Arkhangelsky was born on July 23, 1915 in Simferopol. In 1931, he graduated from a 9-year school in Simferopol and entered an automobile technical school, which he graduated in 1935. He worked as a technician at the Simferopol automobile repair plant. In 1936 he entered the Moscow Automobile and Highway Institute.

After graduating from the institute in 1941, he was sent to work in the NKVD Gushosdor, where he worked until 1944. In 1944, he entered graduate school at the Department of Automotive and Tractor Engines of MADI.

Since 1947, he worked as a teacher at MADI. In April 1957, he defended his dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Technical Sciences on the topic “Some cases of operation of a carburetor engine in unsteady conditions.” Confirmed with the rank of associate professor in the department of "Automobiles and Automotive Engines" on March 22, 1964. On March 12, 1976, after defending his dissertation on the topic “Research and optimization of the operation of automobile carburetor engines in unsteady conditions,” V.M. Arkhangelsky was awarded the academic degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences.

Since October 16, 1957 V.M. Arkhangelsky acted as deputy dean of the Faculty of Mechanics at MADI, and on February 6, 1961 he was appointed dean of the faculty " Automobile transport".

Since September 1, 1986 V.M. Arkhangelsky, at his request, due to health reasons, completed his work as dean of the Faculty of Automotive Transport and transferred to the position of professor at the Department of ATD at MADI.

Under the leadership of V.M. Arkhangelsk 7 graduate students successfully defended their candidate dissertations.

Vladimir Mitrofanovich was awarded the Order of the Badge of Honor, medals: “For valiant labor in the Great Patriotic War", "In memory of the 800th anniversary of Moscow", "For labor valor", "For the development of virgin lands", "For valiant labor".

V.M. Arkhangelsky was awarded the title of Honored Worker of Science and Technology of the Russian Federation.

He was a deputy of the Moscow City Council of Workers' Deputies of the 10th and 11th convocations.

V.M. Arkhangelsky had high organizational skills and was distinguished by great determination and professionalism. He was a cheerful and kind person.

Vladimir Mitrofanovich Arkhangelsky died in 1989.

Arkhangelsky Alexander Nikolaevich is a Russian writer and poet, literary critic, publicist, representative of the modern intelligentsia, candidate of philological sciences, famous TV presenter, familiar to viewers from the information and analytical program “Meanwhile,” dedicated to economic and political topics, as well as the main cultural events of the week.

Alexander Arkhangelsky: biography

A native Muscovite was born on April 27, 1962, and grew up in an ordinary family with his mother and great-grandmother. They lived on the outskirts of the capital, not rich; Mom worked as a radio typist. At school I studied brilliantly in all subjects related to literature. I very quickly gave up doing mathematics, not because of lack of ability, but because I did not like to waste time on things that did not arouse interest.

At some point in his life, he was incredibly lucky: the boy went to the Palace of Pioneers to enroll in a drawing club and, by chance, in company with some guys, became a member of a literary club. It was there that the young psychologist and teacher Zinaida Nikolaevna Novlyanskaya had a huge influence on him. For this young woman, who worked for a meager salary, the profession was something more - a calling; she made literary savvy people out of her charges, giving Soviet schoolchildren many bright and good examples. And today Alexander Arkhangelsky communicates closely with the now grown children - participants in the circle back in 1976.

Life goal set

After school, Alexander, who clearly understood what he wanted from life, made up his mind right away and entered the Pedagogical Institute at the Faculty of Russian Language and Literature. His student years coincided with work at the Palace of Pioneers, where Alexander got a job as the head of a literary circle. Since teaching did not interest Alexander, and he had absolutely no intention of realizing himself in this direction, he forged a medical report stating that he could not teach due to asthma.

The next step in the fate of the young writer was work on the radio, where his colleagues were women of retirement age. Alexander could not tolerate such a neighborhood for a long time: after 9 months he ran away from there. Then he got a job as a senior editor of the magazine “Friendship of Peoples”; Moreover, at that time it seemed to Arkhangelsky that this was the ceiling of his career - there was nowhere to grow further. He liked the work at the magazine: it was interesting, with a lot of business trips. During that period, Alexander visited Armenia, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, where for the first time he witnessed the performance of young people with national slogans and felt like a participant in the historical process aimed at changing the situation in the country.

Author's achievements

In the 90s, the writer worked in Switzerland and fell in love with this country very much. There he lectured at the University of Geneva, and the money he earned in three months was enough for him to live for a year in Moscow without poverty. In the capital, Arkhangelsky taught at the humanities department of the Moscow Conservatory.

Alexander Arkhangelsky went through all the stages at the Izvestia newspaper: first he worked as a columnist, then as deputy editor-in-chief and columnist. From 1992 to 1993 he hosted the “Against the Current” program on RTR, in 2002 - “Chronograph”, is a member of the Union of Russian Writers, and a member of the jury for 1995. Founding academician and president of the Academy of Russian Contemporary Literature.

IN family life Alexander was married twice and has four children from two marriages. Current wife Maria works as a journalist.

Arkhangelsky's television experience

“Heat” evokes a large number of different opinions - a reflective film that tells about a unique period in the history of the country and the Church, a tragic, meaningful and deep period.

Watching a film authored by Arkhangelsky evokes very conflicting feelings. On the one hand, the author introduces the audience to the religious searches of the 70-80s of the 20th century, on the other hand, the film shows only a small part of what was happening around in those years Orthodox Church, and tries to convince the viewer that in the USSR the real church existed secretly, and the true Christians were scientists and intellectuals. The rest of the inhabitants of the country of the Soviets simply survived in the created conditions.

Literature in the life of Alexander Arkhangelsky

Arkhangelsky, as a writer, grew up reading the works of many authors, but he was greatly influenced by Pasternak, into whose work the future writer plunged headlong. The writer strongly remembers his meeting with Dmitry Nikolaevich Zhuravlev, who had manuscripts of this great writer, donated by the author himself. Then at the institute Pushkin opened up to Arkhangelsky, and then all world literature. Alexander Arkhangelsky has a luxurious library with more than 3,000 books. These are all world classics, and the books are ranked according to the principle of chronology (from ancient oriental and ancient to modern) and according to the principle of having a desire to re-read each one again.

Alexander Arkhangelsky: books by the author

What is literature for Alexander Arkhangelsky? This is the only subject that allows you to rise from a cognitive and practical level to an emotional one.

After all, literature is about the heart, the mind, the mystery of life and death, trials, the past and what surrounds people. It is in her that everything comes to life: from household items to animals. Literature is an important school subject, so Arkhangelsky wrote a textbook on this subject for the tenth grade. The purpose of teaching this school subject is to teach children to look for and find the human in a person. Arkhangelsky is also the author and presenter of the series of documentary films “Memory Factories: Libraries of the World.” He has published such works as “The Epistle to Timothy”, “The Price of Cutting Off” and others.

In 1916, the public of Saratov and other Russian cities celebrated the 25th anniversary of the creative activity of the famous journalist, editor of the “Saratov Bulletin” Nikolai Mikhailovich Arkhangelsky.

Congratulatory telegrams, letters, postcards from Petrograd, Moscow, Kyiv, Novorossiysk, Ekaterinoslav, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Samara, Penza, Astrakhan, Krasnoyarsk, from the Caucasus, from Austria, Hungary, Germany, France, from friends and comrades in the profession and many years working together, from theaters and musical societies, from doctors and officers, professors and soldiers, workers and students.

Nikolai Mikhailovich was born in Warsaw on March 31 (old style) 1862 on Freta Street, the main street of the New Town. “Here everything was nearby: the heavy bulk of St. John’s Cathedral, where I went with my mother, Valeria Kapitonovna, who was a Catholic, and Jesuit Street, which converges behind the back wall of the Cathedral with the sunny “bay” of Kanonia Street, and First Warsaw real school where I studied..."

Beautiful Warsaw: the Great Theatre, the Saxon Garden, Jerusalem Alleys, Marszałkowska Street, University, Vistula - all this, together with childhood and youth, will pass through the rest of your life as the most tender and warm memory.

N.M. Arkhangelsky is a descendant of two ancient Russian families: Arkhangelsk and Khitrovo. His father, Mikhail Ivanovich Arkhangelsky, was a major in the Novogeorgievsky regiment of the Russian army, stationed in Warsaw, and a battalion commander. Coming from the nobility of the Moscow province, he graduated from the Moscow Cadet Corps, served in the Pskov Infantry Regiment of Field Marshal Prince Kutuzov-Smolensky, and in His Majesty’s Borodino Regiment. Mikhail Ivanovich died in 1875 at the age of 47 and was buried in Warsaw.

After the death of his father and the marriage of his older sister, Nikolai lived with his mother, Valeria Kapitonovna, the daughter of a Russian colonel and a Polish woman. She was an educated, pious and kind woman. Short and lively, Valeria Kapitonovna knew how to make a modest home attractive and hospitable.

In 1881, after graduating from the Warsaw Real School, Nikolai entered the medical faculty of the University of Warsaw. He was waiting for real activity, he wanted to help his mother, his comrades, who were living even worse. At the same time, Arkhangelsky takes exams for the right to teach at a real school: upon reaching adulthood (21 years old), his mother’s pension for his father was reduced.

At the same time, he touched “politics”: at the school, Stepan Ulrich gave him the works of K. Marx to read, and university student Nikolai Razumeichik, through the circle of Maria Bogushevich, introduced him to the “Proletariat” party. Nikolai began to come home late: he posted leaflets at night, hid illegal literature at home, and collected funds for the revolutionary Red Cross. Fulfilling a party assignment, Arkhangelsky organized a political education circle among the “realists.” Following a denunciation by provocateurs, Arkhangelsky was arrested and sentenced to four years of exile in the Krasnoyarsk Territory.

In Moscow, from the station, the exiles were sent on foot under escort to the famous “Butyrka”; Arkhangelsky ended up in the Pugachev Tower. In the “Tower” Nikolai Mikhailovich met Lev Peak (who will be killed during the “Yakut History”) and his wife Sofia Gurevich (she will also die in Yakutsk: the soldiers will raise her, pregnant, at bayonets). From Moscow - to Nizhny Novgorod by railway, from Nizhny to Perm - on a barge, from Perm to Tyumen - by train, from Tyumen to Tomsk - again on a barge. From Tomsk the party of exiles moved in stages along with the criminals. We usually walked 20-22 miles a day, from stage to stage...

The long dusty road with numerous stops ended: Achinsk. Here several of the “political” people fell ill with typhus. Sypnyak also caught Arkhangelsky. Three months of hospital. Then, together with other “politicians,” Nikolai was sent to the village of Uzhura, the center of gold mining. In Uzhur, Arkhangelsky found himself in the midst of the populists. The colony of political exiles was not numerous, but tightly knit. After two years in Uzhur, where he was engaged in bookbinding, with the permission of the Irkutsk Governor-General he was transferred to Minusinsk.

In Minusinsk, with permission from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Arkhangelsky passed the exams for the title of paramedic and worked for two years in the city hospital. In Minusinsk, Arkhangelsky met with the genius philosopher Timofey Mikhailovich Bondarev, who wrote “Parasitism and Labor, or the Triumph of the Farmer.” Bondarev corresponded with. L.N. Tolstoy, and he wrote an article devoted to the teachings of the thinker.

“I appreciated his outstanding mind,” Nikolai Mikhailovich will write, “ unshakable faith into the truth of his teaching and holy anxiety about the fate of the working people”.

During the four years of exile, Arkhangelsky changed his mind a lot and stopped bowing to the heroes of terror. Arrest, exile, and most importantly, the rapid death of the “Proletariat” forced him to take a different look at his previous revolutionary postulates. Nikolai Mikhailovich came to the conclusion that it was necessary to work hard to educate peasants and workers, to rid them of illiteracy and prejudice.

The exile ended on April 1, 1891. Arkhangelsky was faced with the question: where to go? According to the sentence, he was prohibited from living in university cities and in Warsaw for three years. Once in Krasnoyarsk, one of his comrades mentioned Saratov, saying that the city was good, there were two newspapers and a large colony of former “politicians.” Arkhangelsky decided to go to Saratov. And again the same road, but now from Siberia: Tomsk, Tyumen, Perm, Nizhny and down the Volga to Saratov.

“When in 1891 I came from Siberian exile to live in Saratov,” recalled Nikolai Mikhailovich, “ “The capital of the Volga region” - as Saratov residents called their city - had nothing metropolitan about it. In appearance it was a typical provincial town of Tsarist Russia, only larger than others.

The dusty streets in the center were poorly paved with cobblestones and even worse lit by kerosene “ten-line” smokers; the outskirts were drowned in clouds of dust in summer, in autumn and spring - in mud and pitch darkness.”

It was difficult for the former political exile to get any kind of “service.” Arkhangelsky decided to try his luck at the newspaper.

At that time, in Saratov, in addition to the state-owned “Provincial” and “Diocesan” statements, two private newspapers were published: “Saratovsky Listok” and “Saratovsky Diary”. Nikolai Mikhailovich decided to go to “Diary”.

After the famine of 1891, the cholera year of 1892 broke out. Having two years of work in Minusinsk under his belt, Nikolai Mikhailovich applied to the cholera detachment. “I didn't feel the slightest fear. This, however, happened in my life in moments of greatest danger. I was completely calm", he will say in his declining years.

In December 1892, Arkhangelsky became a permanent contributor to the Saratov Diary. The days and years of Nikolai Mikhailovich’s journalistic work stretched in a motley line. Magazine reviews, feuilletons, reviews, “ Literary notes about the works of A. Chekhov”...

In 1895, during the governorship of Prince B.B. Meshchersky’s “Saratov Diary” was closed for four months for publishing correspondence from Nizhny Novgorod about the activities of the secret police. Nikolai Mikhailovich was again left out of work.

In 1898, a happy event occurred in Arkhangelsky’s life: he married Antonina Vasilievna Titova, a class lady at the Mariinsk Women’s Gymnasium. The year was 1902. Arkhangelsky persuaded N.N. Lvov, chairman of the zemstvo council (later a member of the State Duma of the first convocation), took the newspaper into his own hands - it almost failed under the previous publisher. Lvov had long dreamed of publishing a newspaper.

The editor was A.A. Kornilov - historian, future professor at Petrograd University, assistant editor - N.M. Arkhangelsk. The editorial team included: V.S. Golubev - editor of “Saratov Zemstvo Week”, N.D. Rossov - populist, I.V. Zhilkin - journalist, M.A. Rakachev - journalist (died in the 1914 war), V.K. Samsonov (later editor of the Kama-Volga Speech), K.I. Kacharovsky - researcher of the peasant community, P.P. Podyapolsky - hypnologist, B.X. Medvedev - city agronomist (founder of the Saratov Regional Agricultural Institute), S.A. Sergeev, A.A. Gerasimov is a feuilletonist. In terms of political views, the editorial board was varied, but everyone was united by the desire to improve Saratov and the province, to protect people's interests.

In 1903, Lvov refused to publish the Saratov Diary so as not to spoil his political career, handing over the newspaper to V.K. Samsonov. The editorial office collapsed. At the same time, “Saratov Commercial Bulletin” was transformed into “Privolzhsky Krai”. In 1904, Arkhangelsky was invited to become the editor of this newspaper. At this time, the editorial staff included exclusively Social Democrats, members of the Saratov Committee of the RSDLP, many of whom became prominent party workers: I.M. Lyakhovetsky (Maisky), I.P. Goldenberg (Roman), P.A. Lebedev, V.K. Serezhnikov, K.E. Henry...

During these years, “Privolzhsky Krai,” edited by Nikolai Mikhailovich, fought against reaction, Black Hundred publications (“Brotherly List”, “Volga”) and pogroms for the creation of Soviets and giving newspapers greater freedoms. From the beginning of 1905, “Privolzhsky Krai” became a workers’ newspaper, which, thanks to N.M. Arkhangelsky supports a strong social-democratic line, for which it was repeatedly closed, and Nikolai Mikhailovich was arrested.

During the period 1904-1907, Nikolai Mikhailovich published in the “Volga Region” feuilletons “Wild landowners”, “Guest performers”, “Cruel lesson”, “Updates”, “Triumphants”, “Fatal step”, “Labor nobility” and a number of others, dedicated to the fight against Black Hundred gangs of all stripes, exposing massacres in Bialystok, the idleness of government members receiving astronomical sums from the treasury, and the Japanese war.

After the release of the “Manifesto of October 17, 1905,” the newspaper left the control of censorship and covered the revolutionary events of 1905 more widely. For this path, the editorial board of “Volga Region” was destroyed by the “Black Hundred”, and N.M. Arkhangelsky, being in the editorial office at that time, almost became her victim. After the events of 1905, Jewish pogroms began, led by Bishop Hermogenes, encouraged by the governor and vice-governor.

Along with feuilletons on political events, Arkhangelsky writes articles about the poor sanitary condition of the streets of Saratov, the water supply system, and the poor performance of medical institutions. He writes with passion about literature and art.

Productions of M. Gorky's plays appear one after another on the stages of Saratov theaters, and Arkhangelsky defends everything progressive in his dramaturgy. In almost every review, Nikolai Mikhailovich noted young talents and supported their play.

During these years, Nikolai Mikhailovich became the editor of the Saratov Bulletin, and the publisher was the well-known feuilletonist in Saratov, Ivan Parfenovich Gorizontov.

Nikolai Mikhailovich takes an active part in the work of the Saratov Theater Society, is the chairman of the literary society, and often attends meetings of the Saratov Musical Society. He hangs out with famous musicians, writers, actors, analyzes historical and philosophical literature, and does not miss a single symphony concert. Music brings him joy and satisfaction.

Arkhangelsky is constantly on the move, among different people, from the governor general to the peasant; he is interested in everything, he must know about everything, react to everything - such is the fate of a journalist.

In 1913, Nikolai Mikhailovich learned about the plight of Zinaida Nikolaevna Nekrasova, the wife of the great Russian poet N.A. Nekrasov, who lives in Saratov, and publishes an angry article in Saratovsky Vestnik. He himself recalled: “When reports appeared about the situation of Z. Nekrasova and about the tricks of the Baptist priests with her. newspapers, the impression was stunning. Requests and donations of money poured in from all over Russia; The literary foundation became agitated. “Saratovsky Vestnik” became a center where letters, telegrams, and money flocked.”.

Zinaida Nikolaevna herself recalled: “And then we had to endure a lot of hard things. Just recently, such things happened that if it weren’t for the help of Nikolai Mikhailovich (Arkhangelsky) - truly a kind person! - I would have to eat in the name of Christ. I am for last years I’m used to meeting only cruel and hypocritical attitudes towards myself; Therefore, at first, when they started talking about me in the newspapers, I reacted to this with bewilderment, I was even hurt, but the general sympathy that I now see touched me, and I sincerely thank everyone.”.

The worries and concerns for N.A.’s widow have not yet subsided. Nekrasova, how she shook the city “deafening cacophony, advertising, cheeky hype, behind which a new reflection of art was hidden”. “Futurists from Moscow” perform in the conservatory hall: Vasily Kamensky, David Burliuk and Vladimir Mayakovsky. First, a report that defined the boundaries and tasks of “futuristic poetry”, which promised “airplane and automobile literature - futuristic.”

All newspapers published in the city responded in one way or another to the tour of the “futurists from Moscow”. Arkhangelsky wrote in the Saratov Bulletin: “Speech by Mr. Mayakovsky related to the great oratory skills“, beautifully constructed, clear and meaningful, made an impression on the audience, and they covered it with friendly and prolonged applause”.

D. Burliuk was older than V. Mayakovsky and behaved less defiantly, he was dressed more modestly, and older audiences showed him sympathy. Arkhangelsky decided to get to know him better in order to better understand the new, revolutionary direction in art. He remembered well how at the beginning of the century the brothers P. and V. Pertsov published a collection of poems “Young Poetry” with poems by Nadson, Minsky, Lebedev, Balmont, Tulub, Budishchev, Safonov, Drenteln and Lilechkin. It would seem that most of the poems contained decadent sentiments, but the form of poetry was renewed. Then separate collections by Balmont, Budishchev, Nadson, Safonov and others appeared, and Arkhangelsky wrote a review for almost each of them.

That evening, a meeting between Arkhangelsky and Burliuk took place, at which the artist spoke about himself, about new principles in painting, about avant-garde exhibitions of which he was the organizer. Burliuk spoke about the “magazine of Russian futurists” he was publishing; Burliuk accepted Nikolai Mikhailovich’s offer to collaborate with the magazine.

On October 25, 1917, news of the victory of the October armed uprising arrived in Saratov. On October 27, the Military Revolutionary Committee was created, headed by the Bolsheviks. On the same day, all newspapers were closed.

Since 1918, Nikolai Mikhailovich has worked as a correspondent for the “Red Gazette” of the Petrograd Soviet, “Petrogradskaya Pravda”, Saratov “Red Gazeta”, “Saratov News”. He gives lectures at the Petrograd Communist University named after Zinoviev, at the Saratov infantry and machine gun courses of the Red Army, in the arts department of the Saratov Regional Committee of Trade Unions, at the Saratov Conservatory, and is the chairman of the repertoire commission at the N.G. Chernyshevsky. His wealth of experience and knowledge is used by the magazine “Life of Arts” (Petrograd).

The turbulent events of building a new life capture Nikolai Mikhailovich. He collaborates with many literary and social magazines. In one of them - “Russia”, headed by I. Lezhnev and V. Tan (Bogoraz), Arkhangelsky meets with M. Kuzmin, O. Mandelstam, N. Tikhonov, B. Pilnyak, O. Forsh, M. Shaginyan, speaks with stories about the revolution. At the end of 1922, Nikolai Mikhailovich went to Moscow to meet with old friends and acquaintances - Yu. Markhlevsky, A. Lezhava, I. Maisky and others, who during these difficult years offered him assistance in finding better employment - in the central publications of Moscow and Petrograd.

But Nikolai Mikhailovich remains in Saratov: to get a job in Moscow and Petrograd, it was necessary to become a member of the All-Russian Communist Party of the Soviet Union). He devotes all his energy to the construction of printing and art. Soviet Republic, but the sixty-year-old journalist believes that joining the party at this age is undisguised opportunism for the sake of receiving benefits, which he tried to avoid all his life.

Arkhangelsky’s circle of friends is not decreasing; many turn to him for help and assistance. True to the old friendship I. Slavatinskaya, F. Mukhtarova, I. Rostovtsev, A. Paskhalova, I. Slonov, L. Kolobov, A. Mozzhukhin, K. Karini, Y. Sobolev, B. Pilnyak, K. Fedin and many other artists , directors, writers, critics, people of various professions.

Unemployment and hunger in these years drove many writers, musicians, artists, actors from Petrograd and Moscow to the south, not only for work and bread, but also to wait out the turmoil and cruelty of the administration. It was necessary to hold on so that the “vocal revolutionaries” did not throw the entire “old” culture “overboard” with extraordinary ease.

The pillars of Russian culture - F. Chaliapin, S. Rachmaninov, A. Kuprin, I. Bunin travel abroad, M. Gorky throws after them: “Look what a harsh lesson history has given to Russian intellectuals. They did not go with their working people and now they are decaying in impotent anger, rotting in emigration.”.

Among many “old” intellectuals, Nikolai Mikhailovich continues to serve his people. Nikolai Mikhailovich is involved with great interest in a new business for him - radio journalism. In those years, radio broadcasts lasted no more than three hours a day; only a small number of residents had receivers (reproducers), but they were installed in the workshops of factories and factories, and in squares. He works in the editorial office of the regional radio center, which publishes the daily radio newspaper “Nizhnevolzhsky Proletary”.

At the end of 1926, the provincial executive committee and the provincial committee of the All-Union Communist Party, through the newspaper Saratov Izvestia, congratulated Arkhangelsky on his 35th anniversary of journalistic activity: “A brilliant journalist, with enormous training and culture, he became a valuable employee in newspapers and magazines in Saratov and other cities from the first days of the revolution. Young people welcome in the person of Nikolai Mikhailovich one of the oldest Russian journalists, who devoted all his strength to advanced and revolutionary journalism.”.

On these anniversary days, Nikolai Mikhailovich remembered his comrades in joint work: I. Gorizontov, B. Markovich, K. Sarakhanov, S. Markovsky, A. Kornilov, V. Samsonov, N. Rossov, V. Serezhnikov, K. Kacharovsky, D. Topuridze, V. Golubev, I. Zhilkin, M. Rakachev, P. Podyapolsky, S. Sergeev, A. Gerasimov, I. Lyakhovetsky, P. Lebedev, I. Ivanov, A. Stechkin, who taught him a lot, were in difficult times moments nearby, supported his endeavors, rejoiced at his successes.

An incredible number of newspaper issues have been published over the years, they included the newspapers “Saratov Diary”, “Uralets”, “Privolzhsky Krai”, “Chernozemny Krai”, “Moscow Hour”, St. Petersburg’s “Our Life” and “Comrade”, “Saratovsky Vestnik”, “Krasnaya Gazeta”, “Petrogradskaya Pravda”, “Saratov News”, etc.

How many feuilletons, reviews, articles, reviews, poems, fables, stories, plays and historical works have been published over the years!

Working as the head of a theater technical school and teaching “The History of Theatre” there, Arkhangelsky set out to open a theater for young spectators in Saratov and turned for advice and support to the country’s well-known director and organizer of the first theaters for youth, A. A. Bryantsev.

A.A. Bryantsev responded to his request:

“May 18, 1927
Dear Nikolai Mikhailovich!
...I remember not only you, but also yours critical reviews. In general, I can’t imagine Saratov without Nikolai Mikhailovich Arkhangelsky and I’m very glad that you contacted me, and for such a good cause.
Your project: to establish the cause of the youth theater in the industrial practice of the technical school - an idea that is undoubtedly viable and “fraught” with good consequences.
Not to mention the fact that it speeds up the organization of theater for children, it at the same time gives theater youth the opportunity to rely on a healthy viewer in their first steps, which undoubtedly gives them a better chance of becoming healthy actors...
But there should be a theater for young spectators in Saratov.

With warm greetings A. Bryantsev.”

And at the end of 1927 the theater began to operate. In his production, the children of Saratov and the province saw the plays “Let's Catch Up with the Sun”, “The Little Humpbacked Horse”, “The Thieves of Fire”... Success was visible to everyone. But Nikolai Mikhailovich does not calm down. On his initiative, a specialized theater school is being organized at the city council; Nikolai Mikhailovich becomes its head. That same year, huge posters around the city announced that the poet Vladimir Mayakovsky would perform in the hall of the People's Palace.

On January 28, 1927, “Saratov News” came out with a portrait of Mayakovsky and a large article by Arkhangelsky “Mayakovsky in Saratov.”

“Mayakovsky is one of the greatest Russian poets of our time,” writes Nikolai Mikhailovich. - Peculiar like no other. He is an excellent speaker, an excellent reader, especially of his own works, and a caustic, witty and resourceful polemicist... he turned out to be great master words that know how to rise to real artistic pathos”. Summing up Mayakovsky’s speeches in Saratov, Nikolai Mikhailovich wrote: “Mayakovsky’s performances are an event in local cultural and artistic life. We had the opportunity to personally hear the largest and most original poet of our time, a great master of words, paving new paths in poetry.”.

The “new”, the feeling of the new in the development of socialist society, constantly captivates him. But the negative phenomena that hinder the development of the new society do not escape his sight. In 1936, seventy-two-year-old Arkhangelsky teaches at the I. A. Slonov Theater School, heads the literary department of the Youth Theater, prepares for publication a book about the history of the theater, gives lectures at the German Theater of the city of Engels, in many clubs in the city of Saratov, examines art schools, participates in commissions for course creation foreign languages, appears in print.

Before last days Throughout his life, Nikolai Mikhailovich worked on his memoirs, essays on the history of the theater and the Saratov press, and did not allow himself to relax. He was in a hurry to convey his rich experience as a journalist, writer, critic and public figure youth. It is significant that in 1939-1941 Arkhangelsky worked as a correspondent for the Saratov youth newspaper “Young Stalinist”, where he wrote articles about A. Radishchev, N. Chernyshevsky, L. Tolstoy, M. Glinka, M. Mussorgsky, P. Tchaikovsky, and outstanding musicians, poets and actors from other countries. He did a lot to pass the baton of continuity of the ideals of the progressive Russian intelligentsia to the youth of the new renewed state...

Materials used: - Savelyev-Arkhangelsky O. “I can’t imagine Saratov without Nikolai Mikhailovich.” - Years and people. Issue 5. - Saratov: Volga Book Publishing House, 1990.

Books

Marxist ethics: subject, structure, main directions. M.: Mysl, 1985. 237 p.
Ethical theme in modern Soviet fiction. M.: Znanie, 1980. 64 pp. (Co-author N.A. Arkhangelskaya).
Value orientations and moral development of the individual. M.: Knowledge, 1978. 64 p.
Marxist-Leninist ethics as a system. M.: Knowledge, 1976. 64 p.
Social and ethical problems of personality theory. M.: Mysl, 1974. 218 p. (12 a.l.).
Course of lectures on Marxist-Leninist ethics. M.: graduate School, 1974. 317 pp. (18 pages).
Moral ideals of youth. M.: Knowledge, 1970. 16 p. (1.0 a.l.).
Lectures on Marxist-Leninist ethics. Sverdlovsk: [b. i.], 1969. 132 pp. (8.9 al.).
The norms of our house. Sverdlovsk: Central Ural Book. ed., 1966. 16 p. (1.0 a.l.).
Categories of Marxist ethics. M.: Sotsekgiz, 1963. 271 p. (14 a.l.).
The same Edition in Estonian, Tallinn: Esti RAAMAT, 1964;
Edition on German, 1965.
2nd edition. M.: Mysl, 1985. 240 p.
Labor and morality. Sverdlovsk: Sverdgiz, 1961. 128 pp. (6.59 al.). Co-author V.T. Nesterov.
Tribe, nationality, nation as historical forms communities of people. M.: Higher School, 1961. 40 pp. (2.5 al.). The same in Hungarian, Budapest, 1964.
Our happiness. Popular brochure. Sverdlovsk: Sverdgiz, 1958. 46 p. (2.0 a.l.).
Soviet worker. Brochure. Sverdlovsk: Sverdgiz, 1958. 71 p. (3.69 a.l.).
Categories of materialist dialectics. General, special, individual. Two lectures on the course of dialectical materialism. Sverdlovsk: Publishing house. UrSU, 1957. 29 p. (2.0 a.l.).
About camaraderie and friendship. Popular brochure. Sverdlovsk: Sverdgiz, 1956. 42 p. (2.25 a.l.).
Religion as a form of social consciousness. Sverdlovsk: Publishing house. UrSU, 1955. 25 p. (1.5 a.l.).
Labor and religion. Sverdlovsk: Sverdgiz, 1955. 48 pp. (2.46 al.).

Collective works

Your life position / Ed. L.M. Arkhangelsky. M.: Moscow worker, 1979. 176 p. (10 a.l.);
Marxist ethics today. M.: Progress, 1981. (15.8 al.);
Moral qualities of personality and the main aspects of their study / Ed. L.M. Arkhangelsky. M.: Institute of Physics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1980. (6.0 al.);
Ethics and ideology / Rep. ed. L.M. Arkhangelsky. M.: Nauka, 1982. 359 p. (20 a.l.);
Methodology of ethical research / Responsible. ed. L.M. Arkhangelsky. M.: Nauka, 1982. 382 p. (20 a.l.).

Articles

Moral development of the individual under socialism // Philosophical Sciences. 1975. No. 4.
The structure of interpersonal communication // Sociological problems of personality formation. Sverdlovsk, 1973 (1.0 al.).
The role of morality in the system of social management // Leninism and management of social processes under socialism. M.: Mysl, 1973 (0.3 a.l.).
The subject of the study is moral consciousness // The structure of morality. 1973. Vol. 2 (1.0 a.l.). Co-author Yu.R. Vishnevsky.
Ethical categories // Subject and system of Marxist ethics. Sofia: Science and Art, 1973 (2.0 al.). Co-author G.M. Jafarli.
The most important task of the profession // Ural. 1973. No. 5 (1.0 al.). Co-author R.G. Bukhartsev.
On the relationship between related categories of historical materialism // Sociological research. 1972. No. 4 (0.5 al.).
Moral consciousness of Soviet workers // Spiritual world Soviet worker. M.: Mysl, 1972 (2.0 al.).
On the specifics of class differences in the socio-psychological sphere // Change social structure Soviet society. Materials for the Second All-Union Conference on the problem “Changing the social structure of Soviet society.” Sverdlovsk, 1971. Issue. 9 (0.5 a.l.).
Scientific and technological revolution and personal development // Word to the lecturer. 1971 (1.0 a.l.). Co-author B.L. Alexandrova.
Lenin's principles moral education// Lenin’s ethical heritage and modernity. Tambov, 1971 (0.25 al.).
Problems of personality in M. Gorky’s journalism // Gorky Readings. Sverdlovsk, 1971 (0.5 al.).
Personality as an object of study of related sciences // Problems of the spiritual life of the working class. Sverdlovsk, 1970 (0.5 al.).
On the question of the nature, structure and function of the moral ideal // The structure of morality. Sverdlovsk, 1970 (1.0 al.). Co-authors O.N. Zhemanov, Yu.P. Petrov.
On the place of moral regulation in common system social management in a socialist society // Reports to the UP International Sociological Congress. Sverdlovsk, 1970 (0.5 al.).
On the dialectical nature of the relationship between public and personal interests in socialist morality // Questions of Marxist-Leninist ethics and communist education. Sverdlovsk, 1970 (0.5 al.).
Problems of ethics in the pre-October works of V.I. Lenin // Questions of Marxist-Leninist ethics and communist education. Sverdlovsk, 1970 (0.5 al.).
Ethical values: interaction and dependence // Materials of the XIV Philosophical Congress. 1969 (0.5 a.l.).
On the philosophical character of Marxist ethics and its structure // Philosophical Sciences. 1970. No. 1 (1.0 al.).
Social nature and the role of mass communication // Social environment and personality. Sverdlovsk, 1969 (1.5 al.). Co-author B.A. Yuferov.
On the question of the structure of morality // Questions of Philosophy. 1969. No. 5 (0.5 al.).
Social and psychological factors of personality development and their consideration in propaganda work // Political information. Sverdlovsk: Sverdl. Publishing house, 1968 (0.3 a.l.).
Moral values and individual consciousness// Questions of philosophy. 1968. No. 7 (1.0 al.).
Moral development of the individual // Personality under socialism. M.: Nauka, 1968 (1.0 al.).
Experience in studying the prestige of the teaching profession // Scientific notes. SGPI, 1967 (1.0 al.).
Communist moral norms and their formation // Philosophical Sciences. 1967. No. 4 (1.0 al.).
Life plans and ideals of school youth // Soviet pedagogy. 1967. No. 6 (1.0 al.).
Society, interest, personality // Public interest and personality. Sociological research. 1967. No. 2 (1.0 al.).
Social and mental factors of personality formation // Formation of a communist worldview is the main task of party education. Sverdlovsk, 1967 (0.8 al.).
The structure of morality and moral development of the individual // Materials for the scientific conference dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the Great October Revolution socialist revolution"Questions of Marxist-Leninist ethics." Tambov, 1967 (0.5 al.).
On the study of the interests of Soviet youth // Scientific-theoretical conference “Youth and Socialism”. Abstracts of reports. M., 1967 (0.6 al.).
Moral development of the individual in socialist society // Personality under socialism. M.: Nauka, 1966 (1.0 al.).
The moral side of choosing a profession // Life plans for youth. Sociological research. Sverdlovsk: Publishing house. Ural State University, 1966. Issue. 1 (1.0 a.l.).
The problem of moral development of the individual // “Man in socialist and bourgeois society.” Symposium (reports and messages). M., 1966 (1.0 al.).
Benefit, beneficence // Brief dictionary of ethics. M.: Politizdat, 1965 (0.8 a.l.).
Welcome // Brief dictionary of ethics. M.: Politizdat, 1965 (0.9 a.l.).
Evil, atrocity // Brief dictionary of ethics. M.: Politizdat, 1965 (0.8 a.l.).
Dignity // Brief dictionary of ethics. M.: Politizdat, 1965 (0.9 a.l.).
Honor // A brief dictionary of ethics. M.: Politizdat, 1965 (0.9 a.l.).
Moral norms, their structure and features of formation // Materials of the 2nd zonal scientific conference on philosophical sciences. Perm, 1966 (0.8 al.).
High consciousness of public duty // Moral code of the builder of communism. M.: Mysl, 1965 (1.0 al.). Co-author G.V. Mokronosov.
On the criteria of communist behavior // Soviet pedagogy. 1964. No. 8 (1.0 al.).
Goodness, duty, conscience // Questions of philosophy. 1964. No. 6 (1.0 al.).
Communist consciousness wins // Soviet worker. Sverdlovsk: Sverdgiz, 1963 (0.2 al.).
The public duty of the builder of communism // Communist. 1963. No. 3 (1.0 al.).
Friendship // Philosophical Encyclopedia. 1962. T. 2 (1.4 al.).
About communist moral ideal// Questions of philosophy. 1961. No. 11 (1.0 al.).
The essence of ethical categories // Philosophical Sciences. 1961. No. 1 (1.0 al.).
Formation of communist consciousness of workers and comprehensive development of personality. §§ 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 // The rise of the cultural and technical Soviet working class. M.: Sotsekgiz, 1961 (4.5 al.).
Honor // Ural. 1961. No. 3 (0.75 al.).
The criterion of happiness in Marxist-Leninist ethics // Lectures on Marxist-Leninist ethics. M.: Publishing house. Moscow State University, 1960 (1.0 al.).
The criterion of practice in logic // Practice is the criterion of truth in science. M.: Sotsekgiz, 1960 (2.0 al.).
Social practice and the purpose of knowledge // Philosophical Sciences. 1960. No. 2 (1.0 al.).
Education of moral beliefs, feelings and habits // Questions of Philosophy. 1960. No. 6 (0.1 al.).
On the combination of theory and practice of moral education // Questions of Marxist-Leninist ethics. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1960 (0.6 a.l.).
Practice is the basis of the unity of language and thinking // Scientific notes of Ural State University. 1957. Issue. 21 (2.0 a.l.).
Materialistic traditions in the works of M.V. Lomonosova, F.I. Buslaeva // Russian language at school. 1957. No. 1 (0.5 al.).
On the question of the role of language in the formation of concepts // Scientific notes of USU. 1955. Issue. 13 (1.0 a.l.).